Better, you can record a number of indicates a go-dos particle is get in touch with almost every other areas
Better, you can record a number of indicates a go-dos particle is get in touch with almost every other areas
‘I pay attention “string principle need this new graviton” topic a great deal, but the simply reasons I’ve seen is the fact it forecasts an excellent spin-dos particle.’ – Rob Knop, ,
‘A beneficial massless spin dos particle is in fact expected to become good graviton by the some show that go returning to Feynman, I do believe.’ – String theorist Aaron Bergman, , (Actually Richard P. )
‘Deprive, as well as most of the expert good reason why a great massless twist 2 particle ought to be the graviton, there are also specific data proving one to forgone end …’ – Moshe, ,
‘Aaron Bergman had written: ‘A beneficial massless spin dos particle is in fact necessary to end up being a great graviton by some show which go returning to Feynman, I think.’
Generally you don’t have that many of her or him sleeping to, although I don’t know the strict report to that impact
‘Whatever this type of results are, they need to enjoys extra assumptions. … Most of these have nothing related to gravity. An effective graviton has got to connect to virtually any job – along with a highly particular means.
‘Very, it will be fascinating to consider the outcome you’re talking regarding, to check out whatever they in fact say. Most likely the Einstein-Hilbert action ‘s the “minimum nonrenormalizable” method for a spin-dos particle to engage along with other particles… any sort of that implies?’ – Teacher John Baez, ,
‘B produces: ‘The new twist 2 particle can only pair for the opportunity-impetus tensor – as the gravity really does.’Oh? As to why?’ – Professor John Baez, ,
‘…the 
main point is your massless spin-2 profession is actually demonstrated because of the a symmetrical one or two-list [rank-2] tensor with a specific evaluate proportion. … Very the provider have to be a symmetric divergenceless a couple-index tensor. ‘ – Professor Sean Carroll, ,
‘There is a general belief, reinforced by statements in standard textbooks, that: (i) one can obtain the full non-linear Einstein’s theory of gravity by coupling a massless, spin-2 field hab self-consistently to the total energy momentum tensor, including its own; (ii) this procedure is unique and leads to Einstein-Hilbert action and (iii) it only uses standard concepts in Lorentz invariant field theory and does not involve any geometrical assumptions. After providing several reasons why such beliefs are suspect – and critically re-examining several previous attempts – we provide a detailed analysis aimed at clarifying the situation. First, we prove that it is impossible to obtain the Einstein-Hilbert (EH) action, starting from the standard action for gravitons in linear theory and iterating repeatedly. … Second, we use the Taylor series expansion of the action for Einstein’s theory, to identify the tensor Sab, to which the graviton field hab couples to the lowest order (through a term of the form Sabhab in the lagrangian). We show that the second rank tensor Sab is not the conventional energy momentum tensor Tab of the graviton and provide an explanation for this feature. Third, we construct the full nonlinear Einstein’s theory with the source being spin-0 field, spin-1 field or relativistic particles by explicitly coupling the spin-2 field to this second rank tensor Sab order by order and summing up the infinite series. Finally, we construct the theory obtained by self consistently coupling hab to the conventional energy momentum tensor Tab order by order and show that this does not lead to Einstein’s theory.’
Feynman highlights from the Feynman Lectures toward Gravitation, webpage 30, one gravitons do not have to be spin-dos, with maybe not already been noticed
Today we are going to see an effective predictive evidence of the new velocity out of the fresh new universe which got its start through to the observation the market try increasing, a great = Hc.
Note that the latest external acceleration away from repulsion was compared because of the inwards speed on account of attraction regarding gravity, therefore the data is appearing an absence of velocity. Due to the fact cosmologists knew regarding the Friedmann metric regarding standard relativity one to the latest credit crunch are going to be slowing down (expansion might be decelerating) most importantly ranges, the absence of one to deceleration suggested the presence of an acceleration. Hence, just like the Nobel Laureate Phil Anderson says, the noticed reality regarding the fictional cosmological constant and ebony opportunity is simply one:
<< Wróć do poprzedniej strony
